Quality is not necessarily an incremental item

Dec 1, 2010   //   by Braydon   //   Updates  //  No Comments

Often, when we think of increases in quality (whether that is software, video, errors, etc), we think that’s an incremental gain.  Meaning, quality is a continuous curve that additional effort or planning will get you more of.

In the case of online live video, that’s not entirely true.  There is a fairly important jump between the quality of encoding within a software context (eg: on your laptop) and with the addition of hardware processing (eg: with rVibe’s appliance).  To get from decent, but not fantastic quality to really good or great quality, it requires a substantial change in process and technology.  Of course, than may change in years to come, but for now it’s true.

And this is the rub:  not everything can be done with moderate quality video.  For example – if you need to see something on screen that has a lot of detail and motion – like a medical device, or a computing part, or surgery, you have to have hardware based encoding to have it be effective. Otherwise it’s just lost in the mush of lower processing based live video – and that is plain yucky.

Quality is not always incremental – sometimes it has to be a certain level to just plain work – and sometimes, achieving that level takes a big step in technology.

Which of course, is where rVibe comes in.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Leave a comment